Thursday, December 5

Biden Lies, Hunter Flies

To absolutely nobody’s surprise, Joe Biden lied repeatedly, publicly, and emphatically, and then pardoned his son Hunter after having maintained for months that under no conditions would he do so.


Joe Biden, in his statement, said:

Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted. Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.

Apparently, Joe even lied in this statement.

The judge who presided over the California tax fraud case against Hunter Biden called out the president for mischaracterizing and minimizing the charges against his son in announcing why he was pardoning him.

"The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history," U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi wrote in a ruling late Tuesday.

An attorney for Hunter Biden had asked the judge to dismiss the indictment against his client in light of President Joe Biden's pardon on Sunday night, but did not initially submit a formal copy of the pardon, and instead sent a link to the president's statement saying that his son had been "selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted" and was the victim of a "miscarriage of justice."

Scarsi said the president’s “representations” in the statement accompanying the pardon “stand in tension with the case record.”

"For example, the President asserts that Mr. Biden 'was treated differently' from others 'who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions,' implying that Mr. Biden was among those individuals who untimely paid taxes due to addiction. But he is not," the judge wrote.

He noted that Hunter Biden had said he “was severely addicted to alcohol and drugs” through "May 2019.” 

"Upon pleading guilty to the charges in this case, Mr. Biden admitted that he engaged in tax evasion after this period of addiction by wrongfully deducting as business expenses items he knew were personal expenses, including luxury clothing, escort services, and his daughter’s law school tuition. And Mr. Biden admitted that he 'had sufficient funds available to him to pay some or all of his outstanding taxes when they were due,' but that he did not make payments toward his tax liabilities even 'well after he had regained his sobriety,' instead electing to 'spen[d] large sums to maintain his lifestyle' in 2020," the judge wrote.

Biden had pleaded guilty to all of the allegations against him in the California case on the eve of trial in September. Prosecutors said he had "engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes he owed for tax years 2016 through 2019." He then "filed false returns in February of 2020" claiming bogus business deductions "in order to evade assessment of taxes to reduce the substantial tax liabilities," which he still didn't pay, despite driving a Porsche and living in a $17,500-a-month rental house on a canal in Venice Beach, prosecutors said.

The taxes were eventually paid after federal investigators told Biden they were looking into his finances in December 2020. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/judge-hunter-biden-case-calls-presidents-pardon-statement-attempt-rewr-rcna182825]

Joe goes on,

The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election. Then, a carefully negotiated plea deal, agreed to by the Department of Justice, unraveled in the court room – with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter’s cases.   

Actually… 

President Biden blamed “political pressure” for the collapse of a plea deal for Hunter Biden, but it was the judge overseeing the case who questioned the agreement.

Hunter Biden’s plea deal did fall apart in dramatic format the last minute last year. But it did so after the judge overseeing the case at the time raised issues about its unusual construction, involving two separate agreements meant to work in tandem. That construction violated one of the basic tenets of federal guilty pleas: that any agreement not have any side deals.

That the plea agreement fell apart once it faced basic questioning from the judge was an embarrassment to both the prosecutors and the defense lawyers who negotiated it. But that is a far cry from the president’s suggestion that the deal for Hunter Biden to avoid prison time and a felony conviction collapsed because of political pressure. [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/01/us/politics/biden-pardon-political-pressure.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare]

Ok, so that was a lie too. Joe goes on.

No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me – and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough. 

For my entire career I have followed a simple principle: just tell the American people the truth. They’ll be fair-minded. Here’s the truth: I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice – and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.

Does Joe really believe in the Justice System? Or are raw politics injected into the process? It was Biden’s DOJ who brought the charges and Democrat-appointed judges who convicted Hunter. And if he does believe its rigged, does he think that applies to the ridiculous lawfare against Trump, the J6ers, Bannon, Navarro, and so on?

In fact, the reason those charges were brought against Hunter was a sham from the get go.

No Republican ever cared about the BS gun charge, and the tax thing was very minor compared to the other alleged crimes Hunter committed along with Joe and the other members of the Biden crime family. Those other crimes were never brought, partly because it was Biden’s DOJ with his lapdog AG Merick Garland, and partly because, despite massive undisputed evidence, the charges are very hard to prove.

For years Joe did favours in exchange for money siphoned to his family members, who then turned around and funded Joe’s expenses. This has been reputedly going on ever since he was in Congress. He had quite the reputation as a crooked politician, in fact.

With Hunter alone, Congress has identified $24M spread around 20 shell companies from suspect foreign countries in exchange for no identifiable legitimate good or service. This includes huge payments from the corrupt ex-Mayor of Moscow, several million from China, and several millions from Ukraine. Here is an X thread with hi lights of the evidence: https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1701988846248792318?s=61

In the case of Ukraine, the clear quid pro quo was that Joe Biden would get the prosecutor who was going after corruption at the Ukrainian Burisma Energy Company fired. Joe even publicly bragged about having done so.

Hunter was on the board of Burisma for no known reason other than influence peddling (according to Hunter himself).

On the infamous laptop, a message was identified showing the split of the distribution of profits funnelled from the Chinese Government:

H is Hunter, Jim is Jim Hunter, Joe’s brother, H is Hailey Hunter, “the big guy” is Joe Biden as testified to by Tony Bobulinski (TB here).

The Chinese money was elaborately routed to avoid detection.

Hunter has the gall to complain to his daughter that he has to pay all the family expenses from the money he makes peddling Joe’s influence.


It’s really too much! Democrats are such crooks!

The idea of bringing the gun and tax charges was for the Biden DOJ to avoid being held accountable for not going after these bigger matters, and to show, “look, we’re even handed, we go after Trump and Hunter equally!”

The plea deal that fell through was overly inclusive and would have included crimes and related crimes other than the one before the judge, which is why it was rejected.

When Biden initially promised he would never pardon Hunter, it was with the expectation that he would win reelection, the DOJ would sentence Hunter to probation, and never chase the larger crimes.

Since Joe lost, he had to pardon Hunter instead. The pardon does not narrowly include just the two things he was convicted of, it goes back 11 years to just before Burisma, a period that encompasses all the crimes alluded to above. Jon Stewart does a hilarious take on it:

We are now expecting a raft of pardons to come down next on the other family members and on all the corrupt Democrats who abused their positions of power over the past 8 years.

In a way, it’s a good thing. The Democrats have lost so much “moral high ground”, I doubt they’ll win another election in my lifetime.

26 comments:

  1. Love that you are right wing MAGA, aka sane! We are all supposed to be playing safe, SANE and consensual after all! Love your blog in general too. My wife and I have similar story started our play with me spanking her but turned out I ended being the one that liked to be spanked more. The spankings turned more into punishments at my request and from simply having a red backside we’ve upped the game at my request once again to real canings, beatings with cane marks that last a week! We love cock and ball torture and playing with the pinwheel on my penis until little drops of blood show that I’ve learned my lesson. Where we’re stuck is that always, even if it’s a sever beating, a real legit punishment with tears it’s always “play”, it’s never because I really did something wrong. I’ve spoken to my wife about this but it just never ends up happening that way, normally it’s me bring up that I’m due for a punishment, an ass fucking a spanking or a cock and ball lesson and then when I come home I get. This I’m sure is many men’s dream and I’m not complaining. I love it, I love my wife, I want only her and serve only her. I simply wish there was a way that she would start punishing me when she wants especially when I don’t want it. She seems to like it when I want it. When I’ve suggested punishing me after I cum so I don’t want it, she seems to not be into that. She wants me to want the punishment that she’s administering and I understand that. What’s your advice if I may ask?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You’re being a little unrealistic. It will always be play at some level. You want it after all.

      But you can ask for very spontaneous not prearranged play. Ask her, at some random time, to pick out something minor that annoys her a bit, and to play it up. A kind of role play but based on a real event and she playing the role of angry wife and you the naughty and contrite husband. Ask her to start simple with a mild spanking and corner time, and build from there.

      Delete
  2. We care about presidents lying and using their position to get quid pro quos for themselves or their family now?

    I mean I am a bit upset by Biden doing this and find it to be an abuse of power, but I haven’t spent the last decade defending someone who has been doing the same and worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So when exactly did President Trump take bribes from enemy states?

      Delete
    2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2024/08/02/trump-campaign-egypt-investigation/

      Delete
    3. It’s a story that originates with the Washington Post, the newspaper known to be most controlled by the deep state. There appears to be zero named sources and zero evidence presented. Try again.

      Delete
  3. The woke right can’t take it when they get a dose of their own medicine. Too funny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The woke right (those on the right who condemn anyone who disagrees with them as liars, stupid, evil etc) can’t take it when they get a dose of their own medicine (the Republican Party have a few characters who aren’t exactly angels).

      Delete
    2. Haven’t heard the term before. It doesn’t really “fit”, you know? Most on the MAGA train use their brains, are suspicious of propaganda, tend to look at issues one at a time, and believe in innocent until proven guilty. We call it “based”. We’re proud of being populist. We dislike Republican establishment characters more than the left does (e.g., Liz Cheney).

      Delete
    3. It fits like a glove. Look at your own post. All democrats are crooks and losers who will never win another election. No evidence for any of that. Silly woke stuff from the woke right.

      Delete
    4. You ascribe beliefs to me I do not hold. Address points in this blog post.

      Delete
    5. I did. Quoted you directly from above. You’ve got the woke mind virus?

      Delete
    6. You need to improve your reading comprehension if you believe I wrote that “all Democrats are crooks and losers”. The closest statement to that was “Democrats are such crooks!”. Fair enough when the President is a crook and no Democrat is willing to point that out, which is the intent of such a colourful sentence.

      It is common English usage to say things like “white people like cheese”. Only someone unfamiliar with language would assume what was meant is that every single white person likes cheese, or that no person of any other colour likes cheese.

      Delete
    7. You’re trying to backtrack on your own article. Let’s face it the right can be just as woke as the left. Same principle.

      Delete
    8. I guess you fail reading comprehension. So sad.

      Delete
  4. I agree with what you say. But you and I both know this isn't over. There are more Pardons to come for himself and the entire family.
    I hear you might be joining us as the 51st State. LOL wouldn't that be cool then canada might return to normal. Firefighter Steve

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I, for one, welcome our new overlord, the God Emperor Trump.

      Delete
  5. When Trump was in office, he was allowed in an election year to pick Supreme Court Justices, Obama in an election was not, told it was an election year and could not. Point is when it comes to Trump, it is his way or the highway. What Biden is doing is playing the game by the rules of Trump, there are no rules, who ever is the leader they set the rules. Trump is the President for this country, with so much Hate, he fits the bill. He is out for anyone who is against him, he must have it his way, look at those he has picked for his cabinet, they don't need knee pads, they know is the Emperor. So say what you want, all is fair in love and war and Biden realizes it is time to play the game the way Trump wants to play it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Although I'm a Democrat, I'm among those who disagree with this pardon, for both political and philosophical reasons. Politically, it's obviously a bad look that Biden promised not to pardon his son, then did so. And, I don't understand why he didn't wait until after sentencing, when he would have had a better idea of whether it was even necessary.

    I am glad you admit that the weapons charge was bullshit. The statute he was convicted under probably would have been thrown out had it reached the Supreme Court as being unconstitutionally vague. Given that it would potentially make a criminal of every red state gun buyer who has purchased a firearm anywhere within some totally undefined time period close to the last time they smoked a joint or popped an oxy, every Republican out there would be screaming their head off about this law if it were being applied against anyone on their side of the political fence.

    But, in terms of the post as whole, it might seem less hypocritical had it not happened in the same week that Trump appointed Charles Kushner, his son-in-laws father, as ambassador to a major US ally. For those who don't remember, Kushner was pardoned during Trump's first term. His crime was about as scummy as one can imagine for a white collar conviction. Kushner admitted to tax fraud, and false campaign contributions. That included an admission that he orchestrated a scheme to allocate campaign contributions to certain individuals who had no knowledge that contributions were being made in their names and had not consented to him making the contributions. As someone who has spilled as much ink as you have about supposed election fraud, I'm sure you'll agree this was a serious crime.

    But, the really scummy part involves his conviction for retaliating against a cooperating witness. The witness was his own sister.
    Kushner admitted at his plea hearing that he paid a prostitute to seduce his sister's husband and paid a private investigator $25,000 to film them having sex. He then mailed the resulting videotape to his sister.

    In the Trump regime, such facially scummy behavior not only wins you a pardon if you're an extended family member; it gets you a premier ambassadorship.

    And, while I personally think Hunter is a sleaze and obviously has profited greatly from his family connections, again, your post would seem less hypocritical if it didn't come around the same time it was disclosed that Don Jr. just took a job as a paid consultant for a military drone manufacturer. What does he know about the military? Nothing. Drone engineering or sales? Nothing. Government contracting? Nothing. So, both he and Hunter owe their livelihoods 100% to their status as nepo babies but, while distasteful, it's hardly surprising let alone illegal.

    As for the picture of Hunter, if even 20% of the reports about Hegseth are true, there are probably similar pictures of him just waiting for some enterprising photographer to negotiate a sale to a tabloid, whether for distribution or as a "catch and kill" ala Stormy Daniels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. - I agree re. Kushner Sr.
      - Don Jr. working for Anduril, a patriotic US company, no doubt to influence the modernization of the US military to get into drones, is not the same as Hunter attempting to hide payments from the mayor of Moscow, the CCP, and Burisma.

      Delete
    2. Oh, and 0% of the allegations re Hegseth appear true, outside of him having been a womanizer in his past and having cheated on his exes, something he readily admits.

      Delete
  7. What is it with old people picking one of these two retarded teams? They are all crooks. Biden is a crook. Trump is a crook. Musk is a crook. Clintons are both crooks. Obama is a crook. The next democrat will be a crook. The next republican will be a crook.

    All of us are on our own now. My advice is to get a gun license and save cash for when whichever boomer party fucks things up even more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pre Trump and pre 2024 I would have agreed with you. The hell with all of the Uniparty shills.

      But there’s something different in the air now…

      Delete
    2. I love it when Trump went after the Clintons and Bushes. I like it now when Trump points out how much corrupt the government is. He's right about all of that!

      But Trump is for sale too--he sells bibles, crypto, and all kinds of nonsense. On one hand, good for him I guess. But on the other, he's an honest liar and is not going to do me any favours. Maybe I'm wrong and you're a billionaire too, but if not IMHO you're naive if you think Trump is any different than the other clowns in the circus. They all line their own pockes--Trump is just refreshingly honest about it, like Berlusconi was.

      PS - Beside politics I should also say that I like your AI-insprired fiction. Thanks for that.

      Delete
    3. Trump has been trading on his name for decades now. It’s not illegal or immoral. People seem to like to buy Trump stuff.

      And, yeah, Trump is different. Every other President came out of their presidency a remarkably rich man. Trump went in remarkably rich, and came out with a much decreased net worth. Fact. He’s not doing it for the money.

      Delete