Sunday, June 26

SCOTUS Does Good!

Finally, some sanity from an important institution, the Supreme Court of the United States. And in being sane it also exposes the insanity of deranged leftists.

This past week saw several important cases decided: Dobbs, NY State Rifle, Berger, and Carson. SCOTUS is firing on all cylinders, making excellent judgments based on law, not politics, with the screeching, screaming, minority activist judges dragged along against their will.

Of these, the one making the most news and eliciting the most ridiculous outcry is Dobbs.

Briefly, Mississippi’s Gestational Age Act provides that “except in a medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, a person shall not intentionally or knowingly perform or induce an abortion of an unborn human being if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen (15) weeks."

This law was challenged by an abortion clinic on the basis that it violated the provisions of Roe and Casey where the Supreme Court "manufactured" a constitutional right to obtain abortion up to the end of the second trimester on flimsy or nonexistent legal grounds.

The court held that "the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives."

It was a 6-3 decision, the 3 being the extreme liberal activists Sotamayor, Breyer, and Kagan. Roberts went along with the majority, but issued lots of weasel words in his consent. Alito wrote the main decision, and it was very well-reasoned and attempted to be politically sensitive. Clarence Thomas is the firmest textualist on the court, and minced no words himself.

About time! I blogged about this in R.I.P RBG about 2 years ago. I mentioned that Ruth Bader Ginsberg was herself opposed to Roe on the basis that it was the court making laws, not interpreting them. This case has been made by the vast majority of constitutional lawyers as well. Quoting from my earlier blog entry, these include John Hart Ely, Laurence Tribe, Alan Dershowitz, Cass Sunstein, Kermit Roosevelt, Jeffrey Rosen, Michael Kinsley, William Saletan, Benjamin Wittes, and Edward Lazarus, a former clerk of the Justice who wrote the opinion, who said,

"As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible.... Justice Blackmun's opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding. And in the almost 30 years since Roe's announcement, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms."

The net result is that the question of abortion reverts to a State responsibility, where elected representatives can make whatever law their population, through the Democratic process, agrees upon. I find it absurd that people are protesting the exercise of democracy on this question. It's a hallmark of the authoritarian left to ram their ideas down the throats of everybody.

Personally, if every State passed a law exactly like Roe, but banning abortion except in medical emergencies in the third trimester, I would be all for that. The great majority of Americans agree with that, in favour of abortion but not by the third trimester with healthy mother and baby.

I mean, arguing that a fertilized egg is a "human being" is silly. And arguing that a baby a week away from birth is not a "human being" is equally silly.  Saying the State has no interest in protecting the life of a human being is also silly. Compromise, people.

But I also find it fine that the majority in any State can decide for themselves, and I may agree or disagree with each of their laws. At least it's democracy in action, not judicial authoritarianism from a partisan unelected body. There is no impediment to moving to another state, or to cross state lines to obtain an abortion. I'm sure that with all the money the pro-abortion lobby spends, they can certainly privately fund poor people to assist them in making the trip.

Some people claim what we are seeing is a partisan court, with Democrats and Republicans. I don't see that at all. I see Activists and Textualists. Activists go way beyond what can reasonably be interpreted in the law to get decisions favouring their political viewpoint. The court has been dominated by Democrat Activist judges for a long time. Trump turned that tide and nominated Textualists to the court to make a majority.

Biden the President, Pelosi the Democrat house leader, and Garland the Attorney General  are all making ridiculous statements that dangerously undermine the authority of the court to interpret the law.

From Biden:

From Garland:

The Supreme Court has eliminated an established right that has been an essential component of women’s liberty for half a century – a right that has safeguarded women’s ability to participate fully and equally in society. And in renouncing this fundamental right, which it had repeatedly recognized and reaffirmed, the Court has upended the doctrine of stare decisis, a key pillar of the rule of law. The Justice Department strongly disagrees with the Court’s decision. This decision deals a devastating blow to reproductive freedom in the United States. It will have an immediate and irreversible impact on the lives of people across the country. And it will be greatly disproportionate in its effect – with the greatest burdens felt by people of color and those of limited financial means.

That rhetoric is not helpful and undermines a pillar of the US system: the judiciary. There is nothing in the least "extreme" or "radical" or "dark". The decision returns the right to populations to decide for themselves via the democratic process. It was never a "constitutional right" to begin with, it was only made so by a past activist court and was now correctly overturned.

For an AG, responsible for upholding the law, to make such a statement is completely without precedent, and betrays a true darkness: the mechanism of the State deployed to political ends.

I'm sure we're going to see riots in the streets (I hope not), and i will be very interested to see if the rioters are prosecuted to the same extent, say, the Jan 6 rioters were, or are let off with a slap on the wrist like the BLM rioters were. We shall see.


Another important case was NY State Rifle.

The State of New York makes it a crime to possess a firearm without a license, whether inside or outside the home. An individual who wants to carry a firearm outside his home may obtain an unrestricted license to “have and carry” a concealed “pistol or revolver” if he can prove that “proper cause exists” for doing so. An applicant satisfies the “proper cause” requirement only if he can “demonstrate a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community.”

Petitioners Brandon Koch and Robert Nash are adult, law-abiding New York residents who both applied for unrestricted licenses to carry a handgun in public based on their generalized interest in self-defense. The State denied both of their applications for unrestricted licenses, allegedly because Koch and Nash failed to satisfy the “proper cause” requirement.

(Of course, underlying this, is that it is virtually impossible to be adjudicated to have proper cause in New York anyways, despite people displaying extreme need).

Petitioners then sued respondents—state officials who oversee the processing of licensing applications—for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that respondents violated their Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights by denying their unrestricted-license applications for failure to demonstrate a unique need for self-defense. The District Court dismissed petitioners’ complaint and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Both courts relied on the Second Circuit’s prior decision in Kachalsky v. County of Westchester, 701 F. 3d 81, which had sustained New York’s proper-cause standard, holding that the requirement was “substantially related to the achievement of an important governmental interest.”

The Court held that "New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense."

For reference, the 14th amendment states:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

And the 2nd amendment states:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Unlike the supposed "right" to have an abortion (which does not, and has never existed in the Constitution), this is an actual real right, actually written in plain language.

You may disagree with what the Constitution says, but it would be disingenuous to argue the right is not spelled out in the Constitution. Likewise in the case of there being no right to abortion.


Carson involved religious school choice.

Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that neither operate a secondary school of their own nor contract with a particular school in another district. Under that program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend, and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition.

Participating private schools must meet certain requirements to be eligible to receive tuition payments, including either accreditation from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) or approval from the Maine Department of Education. But they may otherwise differ from Maine public schools in various ways.

Since 1981, however, Maine has limited tuition assistance payments to “nonsectarian” schools. Petitioners sought tuition assistance to send their children to Bangor Christian Schools (BCS) and Temple Academy. Although both BCS and Temple Academy are accredited by NEASC, the schools do not qualify as “nonsectarian” and are thus ineligible to receive tuition payments under Maine’s tuition assistance program.

Petitioners sued the commissioner of the Maine Department of Education, alleging that the “nonsectarian” requirement violated the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The District Court rejected petitioners’ constitutional claims and granted judgment to the commissioner. The First Circuit affirmed.

The court held that "Maine’s 'nonsectarian' requirement for otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause."

For reference, the free exercise clause of the 1st amendment is highlighted.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Maine's law was a pretty clear clear violation of the first part of the 1st amendment.

Once again, you may disagree with what the Constitution says quite plainly, but that should be neither here nor there to a properly functioning court.


Berger is a bit more subtle, but important nonetheless as it upholds not monkeying around with democratically passed laws.

In 2018, North Carolina amended its Constitution to provide that “voters offering to vote in person shall present photographic identification.” Art. VI, §2(4). To implement the constitutional mandate, the General Assembly approved S. B. 824. The Governor vetoed the bill, the General Assembly overrode the veto, and S. B. 824 went into effect.

So one would think that would be it, right? Nope. The NAACP (The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) then sued the Governor and members of the State Board of Elections (appointed by the Governor). The NAACP alleged that S. B. 824 offends the Federal Constitution. The defense was to be mounted by the Governor, the Board, and the AG, all of whom were against the law to begin with. The State House of Representatives moved to intervene, arguing that, without their participation, the State would not be adequately represented.

A District Court court denied that, saying the Governor defending it was just fine, and granted an injunction to pause the implementation of the law.

In this decision the Supreme Court held that "North Carolina’s legislative leaders are entitled to intervene in this litigation."

Basically, the court knocked down an intransigent Democrat Governor who was essentially weaseling his way around not respecting the State Constitution amendments passed by the State House.

Good on them!

Sunday, June 19

Vanilla Wives who Spank

I find it especially exciting when I hear about a vanilla wife or girlfriend who spanks her fetishist guy. I was such a wife myself at one point, and I wrote a popular column, Advice for Wives (with 75,000 views), suggesting others do just that. I was most gratified when I got an email from a blog fan of many years who began a relationship with a vanilla girlfriend who has decided to spank her man partly based on that article, and on one of my most popular posts, Beating your man properly (152,000 views).

He was kind enough to catch up with me and provide several exciting photos and gifs of his girlfriend and him in action. I did a bit of an interview over email to fill in some extra details, and I thought you all might be interested as well.

First of all, here he is after one of his spankings.

Is this case of careful what you wish for? Ha ha!

He goes by the name of Leo. He was 25 when he first wrote me in 2019. He said he has had an interest in spanking ever since he can remember, discovered my blog a few years back, and has masturbated to it countless times. I always like to hear that my readers jerk off to my stuff. Makes me feel covered in cum, you know?

He began exploring his fetish in real-life via some pro dommes as well as a few men whom he got to spank him. He found the encounters with the men considerably more "punishing". Haven't I been saying that?

He recently met and then moved in with a girl. He says she is very vanilla, but he confessed his fetish and she was willing to satisfy him and has become very good at it (as we can see above!).

He provided a short video of one his spankings:

Aren't all you guys jealous of Leo? His girlfriend is such an elegant beauty! And, she does not hold back in satisfying Leo's craving. I particularly admire her slim waist, strong arm, and feminine breasts. Leo has a very cute bottom as well, don't you think?

Leo directed her to the two blog entries I mention above. She said they were useful in helping to understand and learn to satisfy Leo. She also gave credit to one of the books I referenced:

Available on Amazon

She says she doesn’t exactly enjoy spanking Leo per se, but she also doesn’t dislike it. She likes some parts of it, for example the sounds he makes and especially his screams. But mostly she’s pretty neutral about it, and compared it to doing a workout one time. While she doesn’t get turned on by spanking / punishing him, she does like that he enjoys it so much and how she can easily turn him on that way.

Clearly, in my opinion, she has a strong and dominant personality, but just is not sexually turned on by our specific, strange, spanking fetish. I think that fact makes it even more special that she has put the effort into learning his kink (which does not come naturally to her), and made the commitment to satisfying her guy.

The fact that she is vanilla and spanks, sometimes for real reasons as you will read below, makes her closer to the fantasy of a spanking wife. She certainly doesn't get any sexual gratification from it, how perverse, it's for his own good.

Leo says that in bed she’s actually pretty submissive, except sometimes she’ll slap his face while they are having sex (which he loves). She thinks his personality is 99% submissive, which she seems not to mind at all. He thinks he is more than 1% dominant, but I believe her. A woman knows.

I requested more for this blog article, and he sent me another couple of clips.

Isn't she graceful and athletic? I'll bet she's a dancer. I think this is part 2 of the OTK bath-brushing he received above, and culminated in the image of him kneeling in the corner that I lead the blog post with.

I feel I understand this woman completely. Once she got her head around what her boyfriend wanted and needed, and how to do it, and gaining the confidence that it would not injure him, then even though she thought it was crazy, she gave him what he needed. "Ok, if that's what you want, I can certainly do that..." Her enjoyment of his cries and his red ass is just the satisfaction of knowing you're doing the job properly. That was me. Why can't this be ALL women who have partners like David and Leo? It mystifies me to this day.

Here's another video of Leo receiving the Delrin cane, maybe in the same session?

You can see the beating is delivered very dispassionately, in an almost detached sort of way. I find that very exciting. I have invited some women over to spank David, and it's an attitude I recognize from the vanilla women wanting to try it out. There's a certain amused enjoyment in inflicting the pain once all the conventional social barriers are removed.

I was so curious where they had taken this, and I asked Leo more questions about their kinky relationship.

They have not done any role-play as of yet. He would like to but thinks she is not comfortable. That is perfectly fine. Many people feel self-conscious when "acting". I think sticking to the roleplay of "strict girlfriend" is best in such a case.

Leo is like me in that he sort of dreads the actual spankings themselves, but is very excited immediately before, is a good sexual partner after, and the exciting memory stays with him, so it's worth it. And obviously a light spanking won't entirely do it (as for me). It needs to be realistically hard., which is an ordeal one wishes was over while it's going on.

As he's more turned on by the idea of receiving a spanking than the spanking itself, what he enjoys greatly is hearing his girlfriend tell him how she is going to punish him while he masturbates or while she plays with his dick. Leo says that nothing makes him orgasm harder than that. He says she even managed to make him come with her feet one time, and another time hands free, while describing how hard she was going to spank him, how she was going to wash his mouth out with soap, how she’d put him in the corner on his knees, and so on. He also loves when she uses an implement on a pillow to show him how she’s going to use it on his ass.

Leo has not yet tried strap-on play, but he has purchased a strap-on and they will try pegging soon. His girlfriend says she needs to try it to see if she enjoys it. What a great attitude! I think she will enjoy it. She tried on the strap-on, and it melted poor Leo.

One of the nice things about being a spanking couple is if your submissive partner truly misbehaves there's a way to get out your frustrations via a good ass beating. Leo says this has happened spontaneously. Once when he was careless, not listening to her to slow down, and got a speeding ticket. She was genuinely pissed off at him and came up with spanking him very hard as a punishment on her own. Leo thought that was super hot and the spanking ended up very severe, which became a lifelong memory for him. It's why I submit to being a spanked wife: I live for those infrequent "real" punishments which stay with me forever.

I think, in order to cater to his needs, she spanks him for more minor real things as well, such as not cleaning the kitchen or forgetting to turn off the lights. I recognize these things as some spontaneous roleplay. I do the same with my husband, and he with me, It's clear it's not the same as a "real" punishment, but it's exciting nonetheless, like a super-realistic roleplay. So smart of Leo's girlfriend to understand this about him and use these opportunities.

Nobody who knows them in real-life knows that he's into spanking. He would love for his girlfriend to spank him in front of another woman and/or have her join in, but that's just a dream for now.

Leo's girlfriend does enjoy asserting her dominance. She drags him by the ear when she feels like it. For instance, if dinner is ready and he's still on his computer after being called, she'll walk in and drag him by his ear to the table. I think she'll make a great Mom 😉. She also fairly routinely slaps his face. Maybe if he teased her or just for fun. Leo thinks she really does enjoy doing that.

One of Leo's big kinks is a mouth-soaping kink. He has gotten his girl to wash out his mouth sometimes before a spanking. At first she was quite reluctant to do it, but now that she tried it she’s fine with doing it although she still think it’s weird as fuck to want that. Good for her to just shrug her shoulders and give him what he's asking for.

Leo says he would like to try liquid soap, but has not asked for that yet. He shared a video that turned him on to it.

With spanking so routine, it has happened that his girlfriend sometimes threatens to spank Leo. For example, they were out and he did something that annoyed her (not the first time), and she said, "if you do that again, we’re getting back home right away and then I’ll give you 50 hard strokes with the cane and then we’ll go out!" Leo says he instantly went into subby mode. She even made him repeat what would happen next time he annoys her like that. He was good as gold after that. Isn't that wonderful that a vanilla girl has so understood Leo's spanking psychology. Brava!

Leo's girl knows he fantasizes about corner time as a punishment. She usually puts him in timeout after a spanking for 15 minutes, either on his knees or standing up.  She has not yet given him a truly severe timeout where he would have to hold an uncomfortable position for long. Horny Leo would like her to, but post-orgasm Leo isn’t sure it’s a good idea.

But he does very much fantasize about being put in timeout for at least 30 minutes after a spanking. He'd have to hold a coin with his nose or kneel on rice which are the two timeouts that turn him on the most. He would want his gf to make sure that he stays in position otherwise she’d immediately punish him further. He has not yet dared to confess this fantasy to her. Perhaps she will read this article and learn about it?

To me, this is one of the easier things. No effort required. Just put him in the corner. If he wants 30 minutes, give him an hour. Allow him to beg to come out, but refuse him until the time is up. No effort at all, really, just a "mean" attitude required. After his full time is up, make him beg you on his knees not to have to do another 30 minutes. He will beg very sincerely!

Time out with a peeled and shaped ginger root up his bum (figging) is also great. If not handy, use some wet toothpaste and push it up his bum, refreshing it every 15 minutes or so. I think Leo would "like" that.

I asked about writing lines. It’s definitely a big turn on for Leo and he would love his girlfriend to make him write lines as a punishment, but is also something he has not shared with her yet. The previous tips about ginger roots and/or toothpaste apply to line writing as well. And make sure to check the lines carefully afterwards. The smallest mistakes should get extra spanking.

Leo has a lot of different fantasies, but is careful to not lay too much on his girlfriend all at once, out of consideration and gratefulness for all she is doing already (he truly is very, very, grateful).

One way Leo found to show his girl how he fantasizes about being punished is to show her videos he finds arousing. They watch while he strokes his dick. He gave me a few examples.

The first video is from famous pro spanker Alice Morningstar.

Looks to be a husband in a relationship like Leo's receiving an OTK spanking. I like the tighty-whitey warmup. It's almost more embarrassing, isn't it? In my new book, David visits his aunt and all he has are worn and threadbare tighty-whities. His Aunt does not allow him to replace them as they are still "perfectly good".

Those undies come down pretty quickly and now he is hand-spanked to a rosy red.

After this, she gets first the hairbrush and then the paddle out and begins really toasting his buns.

Once done, he's lead by his ear to the corner.

Where he is made to stand as she takes a photo of him to send to her sister.

Notice the corner time. Nose IN the corner, pressing against it. Hands clasped behind back. Bare bum on display. One hour should do it.

You can see so many elements of Leo's fantasies in that video. And I think you can tell that his girlfriend  may well have studied it and applied the lessons learned to Leo's backside. Girls, don't be shy to exactly repeat what your spanker guy has shown you on video. It will never be exactly the same, which is fine, and he will appreciate the effort. David did this with me when I first started.

Here is a link to the video put up by Alice herself on spankingtube: A Quick Lesson.

The other videos Leo masturbated to with his gf present are some videos that are M/F.

One is a mouth soaping and spanking video.

The other is  a hairbrush beating:

You and I both know, and so does his girlfriend, that when Leo is looking at this video, he wants to be the girl.

Leo is honest with his girlfriend. She knows about him having went to professionals in the past and having been spanked by men. She asked him to tell her about those sessions which he happily did. One time she was even playing with his dick while he was telling her all the details of one of his best sessions with a pro.

The best part for Leo is he thinks him telling her the details of those sessions titillated her and "triggered" her competitive side which made her want to spank him as well as he had been spanked by them in the past, which Leo says she has achieved and surpassed.

I would recommend that Leo's girl give him a treat and take him to visit a pro domme of Leo's choosing. They can each try to outdo themselves on how well they can spank Leo's ass. I've done this many tmes with David, and it's always been really fun. The Pros LOVE seeing a wife or girlfriend bring their man in. It's actually a real treat for them.

Good luck Leo, and Leo's girlfriend! Thank you for allowing me to publish this and share your experiences with others. I'm hoping other vanilla wives/girlfriends may read this account and do the same (I'll link to this from Advice for Wives).

To Leo's girlfriend: you are one in a million, sexy lady. Good for you!

To my blog readers, any words of praise or encouragement for the couple? Or any ideas you think they should try? Please comment below. Thanks!

Monday, June 13

First Draft Finished!

As I reported back in New Book Concept on March 30, and followed up in Writing, Writing, Writing, and Book Progress, I've been writing my new book:

David's Spankings
A young man's journey
into domestic discipline
at the hands of his aunt and
her submissive lesbian love-partner

About 2-1/2 months since I started I'm done my first draft. About 460 pages and 47 chapters.

I've written some really good stuff in there. For example, David's first date with his girlfriend is truly epic. It's 90% femdom/malesub. Everything in it is "David approved" for 18-year-old teenage spanko boy realism. There's something for almost everybody in there.

The process now is to edit, edit, edit. The process is like piling a bunch of clay together in the general shape of a book with an over-arching narrative and let it harden. Then you go away and take out some big chunks that don't seem to fit as well as other parts. Parts that may be kinky, but don't advance anything and don't drive you forward to see what happens next.

Then you go in with the fine chisel and chip away until it's just perfect. That involves reading and re-reading over and over again. Making sure everything is 100% consistent. Making sure everything feels realistic (given only the basic suspension of disbelief anybody can expect from a reader). Eliminating smaller parts that may seem repetitive. Tightening up an overly long scene. Eliminating useless words. Simplifying sentence structures. Using a consistent voice ad tense. Checking spelling and grammar throughout. Sometimes even adding things, such as descriptions of what my main character (david) is feeling at any given moment. Or maybe adding some additional titillating detail if I feel I skimped in certain places.

I'm guessing I'm another 2 months away from publishing, but I find it goes much easier at this stage, because all of the major acts of creation have taken place and I am very, very happy with how the book has evolved to-date, so feel only enthusiasm to complete it now.

Back to editing!

Sunday, June 5

Gender and malesub Spanking Porn

Last time I did a post on Realism in femsub Spanking Porn and promised that I would do a malesub equivalent. I think femdom/malesub spanking is the ultimate gender bend.

We can perhaps agree that maledom/femsub in spanking is the "archetype". The woman is spanked by the stronger man to get her under control. Once under control, then the penis is used to humble her and reinforce their relative positions. The ultimate humbling is when the woman is given anal intercourse from her man. Vaginal intercourse is a reward for good little wives. Oral makes her into a slut. Anal is to punish and dominate her. She will know her place after a hard spanking, deep oral, and rough anal (it's how I learn best 😉).

So what does it say when the roles are flipped, when it is the man being spanked by the woman? For me, it's truly the ultimate gender bed, which is why I love it so.

How does the man find himself across the woman's knee? Sure, sometimes it might be force.

And while this is amazing to think about and a great fetish, usually it is not this. Usually it is a woman psychologically dominating her man. It's usually because the man deeply craves this type of attention, feels at some level he deserves it, has mummy issues; and the woman is eager to do it for fun, for profit, for empowerment, to modify behaviour, for control.

Spanking is of course painful and humiliating for a woman. While it can be just as painful for a man (with appropriate implements), I would argue that it is much more humiliating for him.

For example, here is my man.

Why does he allow himself to be put into such a degraded state? You can see he was spanked and forced into little thong panties. It was me and a very pretty young (former pro-domme) female fan of the blog that we met up with (see Fangirl Dominates Hubby - there are a ton of amazing photos of David on that blog with glimpses of me and the lady in question). Why? Because he craves it and has mummy issues. We do it because it's fun, sexy, and empowering.

I like for David to maintain his weight at a healthy level. When he strays, by mutual agreement I get him back on the straight and narrow through humiliating discipline (which he craves, but hopes to avoid the worst of it, and please me so I keep doing it, so it works).

Here was my setup when he violated his diet a few days in a row (note the big red bar - one I forgive, but the next two days, not yet recorded, he also ate like a pig!).

I gave him the the hand, a taste of the paddle, and then his real paddling and then the belt. In between I put him in an embarrassing corner time and informed him he was going onto the blog.

(See Fat Loss and Spanking for my philosophy and techniques for fat control using spanking on a subby as a tool, and also for a full recount of this particular sorry episode.)

Even his young, previously vanilla but happily corrupted female trainer dominated him.  This was one of the worst she gave him.

See Husband Severely Switched by Trainer

That is him in the downstairs gym, his gym shorts and panties lost, bent over an exercise ball, after his switching from this young woman who was almost half his age and half his size.

This is a "man" being treated as a woman. Women submit to spankings because they have to. When he submits to a spanking, he is being a woman. Or, he has been made into a woman. It's really a form of psychological castration.

With that in mind, let's look at some photos from the web.


This is the photo I led with. You can see he has been forced into stockings and panty. Then he has been taken across the older woman's knee for a humiliating panty lowering and spanking while the younger women look on and laugh. It's so unusual! He's in the position they themselves fear being put into by a man. There is a sense of giddy glee seeing a "man" treated like this.


Here is a husband and wife who understand that spanking is gender bending. She put him in a bra, garter belt, stockings, high-heels, and panties for his spanking. Imagine how humiliated he would be if other female relatives and friends saw him treated like this. Is there any doubt who the "woman" is in this spanking tableau?


Here is the reaction we so often see from a young man about to be spanked. He is being humiliated and dominated, and is about to be painfully spanked to tears. Yet his penis betrays him, adding to his embarrassment.  In this photo his slender womanly appearance contrasts with the presence of his spanker. Her body dominates his, not least her "motherly" breasts.


And isn't this what it's all about after a sound spanking? Why does he, a man, allow himself to be put across his woman's knee? Men are led by their cocks. He will agree to almost anything for a chance to get off at a woman's hand. This is psychological domination by a woman. Women can control their own sexual wants and needs. Men seem not able to on balance. (present company excluded? The exception that proves the rule?)


Another illustration of this. Yes, there is a lot funny about the male orgasm. How they wriggle and moan and beg to the female touch on their silly little wieners. And then with the barest of touches they uncontrollably spurt.


Timeout after a spanking from his wife or girlfriend. Pants at ankles. Tighty-whitie undies at knees. Bottom bared. How long will he be made to stand there? If visitors drop by, will he get a reprieve? Certainly not in my household.


Some men are treated more harshly than others. I venture to say that he will not be sitting comfortably for some time to come.


This is quite the humiliation for this loser husband. His wife brought her two friends to see the show. He should not have gone, and certainly not spent all that money on lap dances at his friend's stag party. Now he will fuck the doll until he ejaculates into her. Then he will display his cunnilingus skills and lick her out while they watch. After that will come the butt beatings and extended time in the doggy cage.


Oh yes. Now you're embarrassed, "young lady". If you truly think that housework is "women's work", well I've just made it easier for you. You will stay like that. When I get back, if this house is not spic and span, expect a good hard spanking across my knee with those panties around your stocking tops. If you persist I'll hire an experienced housekeeper to train you with a stout strap in her hand to correct you. And yes, you will be dressed like that while you're being trained.


Wives have many bounties to offer their husbands. But if the husband misbehaves, it is either the cold shoulder and sleeping on the couch or submit to a spanking.


I actually enjoy the captions. That belt looks to be coming off with a purpose, caption or no. Can you imagine how fast her little man is stripping and bending over!


A couple of girls on a picnic with their boyfriends. They want to get into their panties. The girls want them to know who's in control. They don't seem to mind.


Wouldn't it be nice to have such an understanding wife as her?


Being prepared for your spanking. Your genitals are of no interest to her. All that interests her is spanking your butt so hard that you'll be crying like a little girl before she's done.


Fact check: true


The cute little socks helps keep him in his place. So does the spanking. Love the genital and anal exposure while across her lap. Must be embarrassing. Love the tippy-toes touching the ground. The blouse looks rather feminine as well.


If only my husband and I had the physical attributes of this couple. He'd be the one subject to 24x7 spanking discipline, not me!


Now he's going to learn a lesson. Can you doubt that those undies will be coming down?


Yup! Down they came. Who do you think she's talking to? Perhaps the next door neighbour wandered in for a cup of sugar and was invited to stay and watch the remainder of this husband's punishment. How embarrassing would it be to be walked in on during your spanking?


Who's Janey? Perhaps his grown daughter. Your grown daughter will watch you get spanked by her step-mom.


He was warned that if he did not serve properly he'd be losing his panties as well. And he can expxect a spanking after dessert as well.


Better than going to prison and becoming a registered sex offender. Do you boys dream this was you bare bum and spanked in front of a classroom full of girls?


It's for your own good.

Coccyx pain is often due to to a dislocation at one of the coccyx joints, or stiffness of one of the joints, or a spasm of the muscles attached to the coccyx. Manual treatment aims to reduce dislocations, mobilise stiff joints, or relax tense muscles. The method of treatment may vary greatly from one therapist to another. Manual treatment of the coccyx is carried out by the therapist placing a gloved finger into the anus of the patient, and gently massaging or manipulating.


Now he'll get to the ironing!


Keeping the legs pulled apart helps get that strap right up into the crease between the cheeks. He'll be sleeping on his tummy that night and sitting uncomfortably for several days.


This spanking is just starting, the first blow about to land. But she took such care in positioning him, you know it won't be ending anytime soon.


Brassiering as a form of punishment.


The fate of late, rude, misbehaving husbands the world over.


He was caught masturbating one too many times. Perhaps the shame of being made to do it in front of the pretty next door neighbors will cure him?


If you really need to teach a lesson in obedience. Have your personal secretary shop for and feminize the boy, then let her stay and watch while you spank him.


When you go to the Doctor's with a bad case of constipation. She feels the old-fashioned cures are the best and has the nurse give you a good old-fashioned enema. But you get so hard during it that the nurse takes pity on you and ejaculates you onto the towels.


This is not sex that is about to happen. This is punishment. If he does it again, she'll invite her sister over to watch him take it up the ass next time. He will learn his fucking place if she has to do this every day.


I masturbate my husband like this. Do you wish your wife emptied your balls like this?


Your sister and you have got into a "thing" when your parents are out. You lick her asshole as she sits on your face and masturbates. She jerks you off with a finger up your bum.


That's it Baby. Come for Mummy.


Pro-tip: the trick is not to stroke them all the way to ejaculation as you loosen up their bumholes. The trick is to get them right to the edge so that they cum from your dicks up their asses alone.


Yes, in case you were wondering, yes it is demeaning.


It can be so embarrassing waiting there, head hung in shame, as she takes her time getting you for your spanking.


My experience of boys in timeout waiting for their spankings.


The embarrassment factor is ten times worse when Mom strips you bare for your spanking while allowing your sister to watch.


When you bring your friend from next door over to increase his embarrassment as you strap him nude.


My husband in his gym gear (including red shirt, blue shorts, and orange panties, across an exercise ball, after having received a switching from his trainer. I kept telling her to spank him on his sit spots. Was she deliberately being obtuse?


Why is your sister always so mean to you when she brings her friends over?


"I don't care if you're getting second thoughts. You WILL go out there dressed like that, and you WILL include obedience in your vows. Do I make myself clear, mister?"


If he really screws up he has to mumble out his apologies, over and over and over again, with his tongue as deep as it will go up my asshole. Another 30 minutes or so should do it.

Lovely little collection, don't you think? Tell me which ones are your favourites in the comments!

These images do turn me on and put me in the mood to totally dominate my husband. He won't know what hit him tonight!