I was on BDSMLR and found a bunch of posts making fun of feminists. It was 'kinda funny.
Now, I am a "feminist" I guess. I believe in equal rights for men and women. However I also believe we are different in so many ways and that we complement one another. I am not one of those rabid third-wave feminists that seem to hate men and hate all the stereotypic gender roles. So, I do have a sense of humour around my feminism and LOL'd at some of these.
Ouch! In my case, I need both! But the fantasy of the man who won't take any of my equal rights bullshit and gives me the belt makes me sooooooooo wet! "Equal rights? I'll give each ass cheek equal rights to my belt!"
Here's a few on the same theme.
Oh no! So wrong! So very, very wrong! But it's true! If you get a useless degree in college, and working minimum wage is beneath you, and you're at least somewhat attractive... is this not your best bet?
(Are heads exploding yet, or do you need more?)
How about...
Oh! I'm offended! I'm very offended! And that last one? Too far! Too far, I say!
"Patriarchy hurts so much, Sir!"
You know I've had these fantasies:
Yes, yes, I know. They're all gross and I completely disapprove. But why am I turned on, Daddy?
But, we can talk about it, right?
It's all so wrong! I hate myself for even posting these. Yuck! Yuck! Bad Julie! Baaaaad girl!
More than just one man's opinion.
Good old-fashioned conflict resolution:
Not just in the 1950s. For some wives (like me) this survives 70 years later! I do as I'm told when the belt comes out!
I think that photo is perfect. She did not obey so she must face the consequences. She's told to strip. Strip bare. Completely bare. "Now go to your spanking chair and bend over it. Let's see if my belt won't instill some obedience." He has his heavy, thick, doubled-up leather belt already in hand. He's rolling up his sleeve indicating the whipping will be hard and long. A lesson will be taught. A lesson will be learned.
This one is being punished by having her breasts exposed for all the other motorists, especially the truckers, to see. HOOT! HOOT!
"Yes, you're a chick, and you'll do as you're told when a man speaks. Do you need reminding you're a chick? There, that should do it. You're to stay just like that until I get you across my knee. Learn you place, chick."
How chicks get punished:
I include man-chicks in that. You know who you are!
Afterwards:
"Sniff. No, Sir."
This is how I learned to suck cock after becoming a spanked wife. I wasn't doing it right before.
And if you're a spanked wife, this is how your husband often takes his pleasure. I speak from experience, kicky feet and all. Hey! You'd be kicking too if you got that coke bottle cock up your ass!
Afterwards, your asshole wrecked and spermed, the panties go back on, even if you're still dribbling his cum. Short plaid skirt on, praying your panties catch and hold it all, that you're not dribbling down your inner thigh.
Imagine having to go to Sunday dinner like that! Sitting there with Daddy right next to you...
Baaaahaha!
ReplyDeleteOhhh Jules! I just got into a time-machine and have been transported back to 1950's Mad Men mentality. Or the recent Secretary scenes from my blog.
"Hey Toots, would it hurt to throw a little rouge on? I mean, this is your job we're talking about here..." *pencil skirt slap*
Reminds me of this old sexual harassment, parody video for corporate training:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUNXPFI6dYU
"My vagina?......"
"MAYYYYBE!"
Haha!
Ha ha! Love it!
DeleteI spent the majority of my life as a dominant man. I never, ever considered having a woman suck my cock or take it in her ass as an expression of my power. Oh no! Those things were treats she got for being good. It's a privilege to perform those things for your man. It isn't an expression of his power. It's an expression of your devotion.
ReplyDeleteHis power is to inspire such devotion.
Deleteyou totally fantasize about Jack Smith doing these things to you
ReplyDeleteYou deserve to have "mean mommy" Julie bust your ass for such 'cleverness'.
DeleteVery sexy. As a percentage not all of your sub stuff attracts me, but photos of squealing, crying, kicking, sexy spanked girls and girls /women learning to worship or please 'the cock' are a treasure. Now we need the male sub version. It's certainly been a long while since you wrote a post about anyone short of your guy worshipping pussy...
DeleteJack Smith is a little regime bitch who can suck my cock!
DeleteWhat's not to like?
DeleteCan you play a free trump counter sued Smith and Im smith dressed as lady taking your revenge cum dildo / alpha partner?
DeleteWould not give Smith that much pleasure!
DeletePresumably a feminist enjoying these fantasies is the equivalent of men enjoying captions about how they should be cuckolded, sissified, humiliated etc... Whatever the psychology, they are hot, especially the spanking ones!
ReplyDeleteRight on! You may be right.
DeleteTrue! And we man-chicks can enjoy as we fantasize being the girl. Would love to be the wife OTK.
DeleteYes!
DeleteNot sure I really do believe that men and women are equal, but there is definitely more variation among both sexes than between the means of both sexes.
ReplyDeleteI guess I agree with you on that after all.
DeleteHeads are exploding, Bogey
ReplyDelete🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
DeleteGoing after the gender study majors is too easy lol. They were sold a bunch of lies from the universities about how they could make a career out of those majors.
ReplyDeleteThat said, the gifs are super hot. And all those women should know of ways they could turn it around on to their partner if they wanted to. Yet so many want to be taught a lesson and spanked!
Can you imagine what all that indoctrination about "the patriarchy" countering all of your natural instincts for 4 years would do to you? You'd be dying to get just railed by some MAGA stud :-)
DeleteMen may think they are in control, Men may think women need a spanking to maintain control. You know better, women control men, when a woman wants a spanking, she has her ways to get that spanking. My wife read this and when she started laughing, I knew there was more to this. She reminded me, men may think they know women, men may think they are in control, the key word is 'Think'. Jack
ReplyDeleteThat's a bit too simplistic. Yes, we've been practicing wrapping men around our little fingers since birth, but sometimes we push a bit too far and our bullshit gets called, over his knee.
DeleteI wonder that, does a woman go to far and gets more than she wanted but needs. Jack
DeleteSo how do you get David to spank you? Is there a place that you would like to be giving a spanking, or have thought would it not be nice to be spanked here. Jack
ReplyDeleteIf I want one I just ask. Every now and then I do something which earns me a spanking. Am not trying to get those, those just happen!
DeleteMost of that series of memes demonstrates that you can disagree with a political/cultural position and still laugh out loud at a clever meme that's contrary to your position. Or, at least we should be able to. You and I are on opposite sides of the fence politically, but can everyone just get a fucking sense of humor again?
ReplyDelete🎯
DeleteSomehow women outlive men.
ReplyDeleteThe nutritious benefits of cum (or so my husband tells me).
DeleteMm considered my male bi curious/coerced wanting self as these women..
ReplyDeleteNeed training for my past non feminist ways for you and another daddy taming and feminizing me..
Nothing like a bit of empathy training to defeat the patriarchy!
DeleteConsider me the bitch for all men..i had my college age numbers of “sluts”, oof, my lovely gf is 26 fit spanish mexican school girly..learning to get feeldoe and I said make me like the freezing white boy in Hateful Eigth crawlingg in snow begging for a blanket..hehe I wish julie i could be both you two goddesses and david n a studs bitch puppy slave learning gay ass rental lol party humilation..i came in my face for you after i tamponed my boi pussy so u own it, graduate me to real anal pounding and cum from stud some day queen..i loved your imagery i deserve male and female spanks and begging male to allow my cum while he used me..holding you twos ladies hands swoon im your ass slave.
DeleteAwwww! Cute!
DeleteThanks Julie! This excited me, as your words always do so deeply.
DeleteI look like shai la beuff and my girlfriend young J Lo, wish I could give you permission with her to own my sexuality and hers.
Love to be made a feminized slut for anyone you deem.
I should pay for my younger misogyny with this!
Love to be cucked and shown what it feels like to be a used bimbo, leashed and made to serve and suck and be fucked by alphas.
Love the whole post, I don't think gender studies are political just batshit crazy. The captions are creative, the last pic with that little feminist pucker anticipating...craving more cock... delightful.
ReplyDeleteNot your bottom perhaps and you have been so generous in sharing I like to imagine it's you.
Kindest regards
Chris
It often is!
DeleteIf a man after spanking wants a blow job, my wife reminded me that how good or how bad the spanking was, giving a blow job could become something he did not want. Jack
ReplyDeleteGreat post, just great. Just another reason why I love you.
ReplyDelete🙏
DeleteHmm, the blowjob as dominance. I am submissive and have only had maybe a dozen or so - half of them while driving on empty western highways. Irene always swallowed, never said much about it.
ReplyDeleteOur dominant/submission stuff is, on the other hand, wholly subsumed in our reverse cowgirl cunnlingus. These days I’m usually tied down, after several whippings or spankings, unable to use my hands when Irene mounts my face. She’ll put her knees on my chest and sit on my face smothering me with her powerful bottom. Then Irene will take the pressure off so I can gently engage in the oral servitude that she requires. Sometimes she’ll continue to strike my balls with a riding crop, at least until her own pleasure consumes her.
Rosco
Sounds awesome! All of it!
DeleteI guess it’s a good thing that kinksters and actual misogynists can laugh at the same “jokes”? Maybe.
ReplyDeleteI've yet to meet an "actual misogynist". What do they look like?
DeleteI don’t think misogynists look any particular way. Would you not agree that Andrew Tate is a misogynist? What about guys in the Incel movement who blame feminism for their inability to get laid and wish to get revenge on women? That’s misogyny, right. Let’s face it, those “jokes” about putting feminists in place by sexually degrading them are, at face value, misogynist AF. You see them as funny because presumably you don’t take them at face value. You are viewing them ironically through a kinky lens. Strident feminist gets spanked and forced to suck dick by male chauvinist pig. I can see that could be a hot fantasy even for a feminist if she is into BDSM. But it is hot because it is transgressive, and it is transgressive because it involves misogynistic degradation, which is a real thing. But when it’s a real thing, rather than consensual role play, it isn’t funny. I confess, with some feeling of guilt, I find those memes hot myself because I am one of those “man chicks” you mention. I can get turned on by imagining myself as the women in those scenarios. Even better for me is the reverse fantasy: male chauvinist pig gets spanked, locked into chastity, and made to serve a female supremacist. Now that would be funny. As an idea that is.
DeleteDefinitely not Andrew Tate. He respects women and wants us to respect ourselves.
DeleteOne off crazy people who kill people are just crazy.
I think "incel" and MGTOW have a point. Women as a group are horrid.
But sure, I'll give you that there may be men out there who if left without rules might torture women for fun because they hate all women. I've just never met anybody remotely like that. And if so, see crazy people above.
In a world without rules I can see women being disciplined by men, sometimes unjustly, but more for practical reasons and/or because they love us. We would get raped an awful lot which is why you need to pair up with a mate very capable of violence to protect you!
“Women as a group are horrid”. That statement is practically the definition of misogyny. Unless you add, “men as a group are also horrid”, which would mean that our entire species is horrid, which would make you a misanthrope rather than a misogynist, I suppose. By the way, if you believe Andrew Tate “respects” women, well, I guess you share his view of the natural place of women, which is a lowly and limited one indeed.
DeleteI've listened to a fair amount of Tate stuff that contradicts what you say he believes. I'm sure you can find some out of context clips that make it seem otherwise, but I prefer to rely on his full in-context musings.
DeleteI think women as a group are more horrid than men as a group. Men keep other men in check with violence and they are protective of women. Women engage in slander and reputation destruction almost unchecked.
I personally love (or dislike) individuals only, never groups.
I’d say I know a number of men whom I’d call misogynist with a small “m”. They don’t respect women’s opinions as a whole or their ability to make certain decisions wisely.
DeleteI’ve also known some men, not friends, who are fully disrespectful to women as a whole behind their backs. Not sure whether they’re trying to impress others or whatever. Occasionally I’ve replied but more often ignored.
But the reverse is also true. Irene was just telling me that the her (female) book group meetings tend to culminate with unwarranted criticism of men as a whole.
Rosco
Even those small-m misogynist don't think ALL women are like that (everybody who talks broadly about groups does not mean every individual in that group). They're making a broad observation about the average that I agree with. After all, the Democrat party is entirely held up by single women.
DeleteA lot of men banter and joke about women, as we do about men, but when rubber hits to road I'm ride or die for my man, as are many others.
I agree with you, Rosco. I know men who are misogynistic to varying degrees. Some are sort of benignly misogynistic in the sense of just taking women less seriously than men. Pretty well every woman I know tells me that’s common. I’ve also known men who talk about women in more toxic ways. Incel culture is philosophically committed to misogyny. Julie has more or less granted that, but she has essentially argued that you can’t blame incels for being misogynistic because women deserve it since, “as a group they are horrid.” If you accept the premise that in general “women are horrid”, you are a misogynist pure and simple. So then the real argument isn’t whether misogyny exists but whether it is justified.
DeleteOh, we deserve it!
DeleteThat’s your kink talking, Julie. Women who don’t share your kink would probably disagree.
DeleteMore my politics talking. Women (as a group) become overly emotional in their decision making favouring immediate goals over putting in place longer-term systems that achieve and sustain those goals. I don't include myself in that, it's an observation about my sex group in general.
DeleteIt’s an observation unsupported by evidence.
DeleteUntrue. The psychology literature is filled with temperamental differences between men and women that all point in this direction (on average).
DeleteWhy do you suppose there are many more men than women in prison for doing stupid, hot headed shit? Must be because men have such superior command of their emotions. Why are girls and women outperforming boys and men at every level of the education system, now that the barriers girls traditionally faced have now been largely eliminated? Is it because males are so much more in control of their emotions and to delay gratification that they are better able to set long term goals and to sustain those goals?
DeleteWhile men and women have equal IQ, men have a larger spread, hence more dumb criminals and genius scientists, mathematicians, chess players, ...
DeleteThe educational system is built by women for girls, at every level. Boys and men are increasingly marginalized and taught how to be women.
I see your point, but it’s not that the education system is built by women for girls. The academic curriculum requires the same kinds of skills and abilities as it did when it used to be geared mainly to boys, and girls were encouraged to train for non-academic careers or to be stay at home mothers. Overall, girls do better now, but it’s not because the system has been rigged in their favour by women. Boys who are able to concentrate and apply themselves do fine too, as they always have…as I did myself. The only difference is that back when I was in school, it wasn’t a problem that many boys weren’t academically inclined. There used to be lots of well paid unionized blue collar jobs for boys who weren’t good in school. Unfortunately, changes in the economy (offshoring or mechanization) have caused those jobs to dry up. That is why both the education system and the economy advantage women now. I have had a career in education, and I know that a great deal of energy is directed at trying to make school more engaging for boys. It is, however, true that the system could benefit from more male teachers to serve as role models for boys. You scoff at the notion of “patriarchy”, but the imbalance between women and men teachers is largely due to the traditional patriarchal attitude that working with children is women’s work. Patriarchy is a real thing, and it causes problems for boys as well as girls. Or so it seems to me.
DeleteYou use the word "patriarchy" too loosely. The common understanding is of a male-led society where men exert tyrannical power over women. While at some point in the past we were closer to that (though never completely), we are very far from that now. You are just talking about differences between men and women. Women were genetically selected to be more nurturing, hence they occupy those jobs. If the schools are "trying very hard" to make sure boys are successful they are doing a progressively worse and worse job of it.
DeleteIt is false that schools are doing progressively worse. High school graduation rates and post secondary attendance for both boys and girls have increased steadily since I was a student. The “crisis of masculinity” is driven mainly by economic changes which have harmed men who would have done just fine in decently paid blue collar jobs in the past. The economic policies that have harmed those men and led to increasing levels of economic inequality have all been cheered on by conservatives. It is not the fault of the education system that the economy is changing in ways that favour the kinds of skills that advantage women. To what extent society is still patriarchal is an interesting and complex question. For example, we need more men in professions traditionally coded as feminine, like teaching and nursing. If boys disdain such career choices because of attitudes about proper gender roles, that is a vestigial effect of patriarchy. If men (and women) feel that it is emasculating for a man to earn less than his wife, that is a vestigial effect of patriarchy.
DeleteReally? I see declining standards in general all over the place. International test scores back that up.
DeleteBut that's not the main point. The main point is that boys are not going to university in proportionate numbers any more. That's a hard fact.
There is a lot of research on personality differences in the sexes leading to different career choices. It's a staple of the field.
Canada always scores well internationally, i.e. in the top 10. In the USA, on the other hand, public education is a disaster. That’s because we have a stronger commitment to public education than Americans do, so educational opportunity is more evenly distributed here. Also, conservative politicians in the USA have done everything in their power to make teaching an unattractive career choice. Where teachers are poorly paid and disrespected, high caliber university graduates will choose other fields. In the countries that score highest in international tests, teachers are respected, well remunerated professionals, and educational opportunity is more equally distributed.
DeleteThe reason boys are no longer going to university in proportionate numbers is because girls are going in much higher numbers than in the past, when girls used to be told that they didn’t need higher education. It has nothing to do with the system being rigged against boys. The economy, however, is rigged against the kind of men who used to have well paid blue collar jobs. But conservatives love to blame “liberal education policy” for social problems resulting directly from conservative economic policy.
I'd argue the teachers unions have a lot more to do with lowering the quality of teachers and bringing the profession into disrepute.
DeleteBoys are checking out in a much greater number than ever before. Good case to be made that the woke nonsense has a lot to do with it.
I knew you would blame teachers’ unions. Given all the right wing positions you espouse, the chance that you would not blame teachers’ unions was approximately zero. It is also unsurprising that you believe “woke nonsense” explains the problem. For right wingers, woke nonsense explains every problem we face.
DeleteI knew you would hold them blameless and completely discount wokeness. So typical of "people like you" (tm).
DeleteJulie, as ideologically opposed as we are, we could probably find some common ground. For example, I agree with the psychological evidence that “on average” men and women tend to have different interests and would, therefore, on average make different career choices, within the constraints of economic circumstances. Would you not agree, on the other hand, that individual girls and boys often don’t conform to those gender expectations and that it is, therefore, a harmful effect of vestigial patriarchalism to discourage gender nonconformity? Similarly, because the current economy has shed many of the well paid blue collar jobs that used to be available to men who were not academically inclined, the “crisis of masculinity” has more to do with changes to the economy than changes to the education system? One patriarchal attitude that definitely needs to change is that it is shameful for a man to earn less than his wife. According to surveys, many men believe that, and some women do too. That probably needs to change, don’t you think?
DeleteWhen I use the term "men" and "women" I (and nobody else, ever) is referring to every last one of them. Of course individuals should be treated as individuals. It need not be said and I'm surprised you were ever even confused on that point. NOBODY is suggesting discouraging nonconformity. Most rabidly applaud it, as do I. (And by NOBODY implicitly add "except for a tiny minority of idiots not worth talking about" for the pedantically inclined).
DeleteI think what you refer to is one contributing factor, but there are others.
I think a man should strive to earn enough to support his family, although that is becoming increasingly difficult.
I am left wing largely for economic reasons. Social conservatives want to turn the clock back to a time when life was better for blue collar men. That’s fine. But the economic policies of conservatives since the Reagan/Thatcher era—including neo-liberal “liberals” like Bill Clinton—have rigged things so much in favour of the 1% and against blue collar workers, that it requires two incomes to raise a family, and often that isn’t even enough. And since there is more economic opportunity for people with the kind of skills acquired in school, men are losing the gender advantage we had when I was young. So I find that blaming feminists, and a supposedly feminized education system, for the plight of blue collar men nourishes a misplaced sense of grievance.
DeleteI believe in a well-regulated free market (not crony capitalism that establishments Republicans and Democrats push for self-interest).
DeleteI think the left wing economic policies of free hand outs ignores all notions of human motivation and has been disastrous for poor communities.
People need to work and contribute and get paid for it.
And two things can be right at once, mister binary. It's not an either or.
I saw one the other day, on BDSMLR. It was the skyline of San Fransisco with the Transamerica tower. It said “this is what men did”. Then the opposing caption was a woman on her knees who had just taken a facial. That caption said: “what did you do?”
ReplyDeleteOmg it was so horrible. Jesus H! Lol
The desire for women inspired those men to build it!
Deletelmaoooo 41 counts of ricooooooo, 41 counts of rico but knowing how your mind in mentally warped u gonna say its a guy from mexico
ReplyDeleteYou seem widely delighted by the weaponization of the courts to stop a political opponent. Have you read the charges? Absurd and laughable. You should be ashamed of yourself.
DeleteYour guy is a farce. You are a farce. A "weaponization of the courts to stop a political opponent". What bullshit. Maybe don't break the law?
ReplyDeleteFortunately, there are people out there that understand the laws. If your guy is innocent, he will go free. In fact, even if he is guilty, he may go free. But he is guilty: the information is all out there.
And you are just a crazy conspiracy theorist, top to bottom.
Majority of legal commentators are on my side of this seeing it as a political prosecution. All the charges are based on highly unusual and never tried before interpretation of law. If you're going to go after a former President and the current front-runner, it better be a blindingly obvious precedent, which is just factually not the case. Your TDS blinds you to simple common sense. People like you are dangerous to democracy.
DeleteAgain, what a farce. You and Trump are the obvious danger to democracy. If the "majority of legal commentators" are right, then he will go free.
DeleteYou know and I know that this won't happen. Of course he is guilty. Your "majority of legal commentators" are probably as well qualified as your climate scientists.
Alan Derschowitz
DeleteMany indictments here; he may beat one.
DeleteWhen he gets off one, you will say, they're all like this. (With no evidence whatsoever)
You clowns are a joke. "What about Hunter Biden? What about Hunter Biden????"
What about him? If he did something wrong then charge him. Show me some EVIDENCE that Joe was involved. Something.
And if Joe is guilty, then OF COURSE, charge him. But geez, Trump is a farce. Of course Trump should be in jail.
None of them have any substance.
DeleteThere's ample evidence that Joe is wrapped up in the influence peddling. "10% to the big guy". "Half my income goes to my Dad", eyewitness testimony that Joe lied trying to cover up his frequent meetings with his son's shady business associates. You need to be blind to not see it. Not sure if any of it is illegal, but it definitely is disqualifying and he should be impeached over it.
If the worst Republican accusations about influence peddling by Biden are true, that would basically mean the Biden family was like the Trump family in that respect. So when you say Biden should be impeached for it, are you suggesting that Trump should have been impeached for it too. Or are you suggesting that all charges against Trump should be dropped unless Biden is impeached for that?
DeleteNight and day. Bidens collect money without any legit services rendered. I assume you're alluding to Jared Kushner who is/was a legit mover and shaker ibefore and after Trump. Other than that, the Trump enterprise as a whole took a hit while he was President, unlike Biden who enriched himself atrociously while VP.
DeleteJulie, from what news media are you getting the idea that majority legal opinion favours Trump. I have the opposite impression. Even Trump’s own former Attorney General believes that Trump is guilty and in deep legal trouble. Are there dissenting legal opinions? Sure. But I don’t think they are the majority. Even on the Republican side, the defence of Trump seems to be that Trump shouldn’t be held accountable for obvious corruption and dishonesty because all politicians are corrupt and dishonest.
ReplyDeleteNot news media, I listen to them directly: Jonathan Turley and Alan Dershowitz, considered the foremost constitutional experts, both noted Democrats. Barr is a politico, not a legal scholar. And no, that is not the defence of Trump except on the documents thing, which is blatant double standards, yes. Georgia is a legal farce. Even a tiny amount of critical reading, thinking, listening, would convince anybody of that except the most ideologically captured.
DeleteAssuming Trump legit believes the election was stolen (which I do as well, and about 60% of the electorate also), can you actually articulate a crime with an actual victim?
I don't believe that Trump believes the election was stolen.
ReplyDeleteHe was going on about how he would fight the fake election results *before* he won in 2016. And then again *before* any results were in in 2020. He went on about how he fight the illegal votes in one of the debates against Biden, again before the election.
He always made it know that he would not accept any result unless that result supported him. He is an obvious liar. He will lose these cases, because this is apparent to anyone with a rational mind.
(Not you, clearly.)
You can read his mind, can you? Contra to every single public and private statement he's ever made? What is your objective evidence he doesn't believe what he's consistently said?
DeleteThe fact that he had prior warning it would be stolen does not help your case.
YOU are lying when you say "he always made it known he would not accept any result unless the result supported him." When did he ever make such a statement? When asked if he would accept the results he consistently said "we'll have to see" - he reserved the right to protest it if in his judgment he believed it was rigged.
Your irrationality is on show. Defend yourself.
Ha ha! I am "lying", am I? Good luck with the "I know you are but what am I" argument. Let's see how that works in these court cases.
ReplyDelete(Hint: probably not too well.)
Jack Smith totally rules.
Yes, your statement that Trump said what you claimed is a lie that serves your argument. You did not (could not) defend your lie. You are therefore a dishonest person. Sorry, I don't make the rules.
DeleteSome hot pictures as always.
ReplyDeleteSay if i were to write you an E-Mail with lets say some things spanko or bdsm related or such. Do you always respond to E-Mails? Or do you just read them because you get so many, also how can one get in a back and forth with E-Mails with you? Some successfully have, as you have shown on here.
Sure! Just go ahead and write. Email adress is top right in the About Me box.
DeleteJulie will write you back, be thoughtful compassionate and kind.
DeleteJulie Rocks !!!
C
A very hot fantasy for rp for all involved! Something tells me these gifs get you horny and masturbating furiously
ReplyDeleteWell... yes... a little... ok, a lot!
Delete